SeaDoc welcomes two new board members

This month SeaDoc welcomes two new board members, Ingrid Rasch and Dave Roberts.

PhotoRasch-108-151.jpg

Ingrid Rasch is a community activist and non-profit volunteer. She currently chairs the board of Earth Economics, a non-profit that focuses on rigorous analysis of the value of natural systems. In her career she was VP of Human Resources for Sonus Pharmaceuticals and Senior VP of Human Resources at the $10+ billion Stop & Shop Supermarket Company. She also led the first human resources department at Microsoft. Ingrid is a board member of the Sustainable Path Foundation, a member of the Washington State Wildlife Diversity Advisory Council, and a director of the Pacific Northwest chapter of E2 - Environmental Entrepreneurs.

Ingrid says, "I am passionate about restoring the Salish Sea in my lifetime --- and I'm old, so we need to hurry!"

Note: Ingrid isn't actually that old! :)

DaveRobertsPopCap_282-108-154.jpg

Dave Roberts is the former CEO of PopCap Games in Seattle, which he helped build from a small studio into a company that was sold to Electonic Arts for more than $750 million. Prior to PopCap, Dave was an executive at Visual Communications Group, founded an interactive publishing company, and served in management roles at Aldus and Apple Computer. He is a member of the advisory board for the Buerk Center for Entrepreneurship at the Foster School of Business at the University of Washington. He splits his time between Seattle and the San Juan Islands.

What's a 50+ year old bird band doing on an Eastsound beach?

Bird band found on Eastsound beach in 2014

Bird band found on Eastsound beach in 2014

A few weeks back our friend Trey Vore showed up at the SeaDoc office with a metal bird band he'd found on the beach in Eastsound.

The band read "Advise Wildlife Service. Write Washington DC USA." And it had a number on it.

(Oddly enough, though, no web address...)

Joe Gaydos knows just what to do with this kind of thing, and he reported the band on the US Geological Survey website.

bird-banding-info-445-223.jpg

Turns out the band had been put on a California Gull at some location south of a town called Williams, Montana in 1961.

Williams, MT, is east of the rockies

Williams, MT, is east of the rockies

We're not suggesting the gull lived 50 years, but it does seem likely that it flew from Montana to the shores of Eastsound, where it eventually died.

Keep a lookout on the beach. You never know what you'll find...

Video: You've never seen killer whales like this before

If you love killer whales, take 10 minutes and watch this video podcast from NOAA Fisheries.

NOAA and the Vancouver Aquarium teamed up to photograph Northern Resident Killer Whales from an unmanned aerial vehicle (with the proper permits, of course).

The footage and the photographs are beautiful, but when you watch the video you'll see how much information scientists are able to gather just by looking at these high-resolution photographs.

You'll learn how to identify whales that are starving, doing well, and even ones that are pregnant.

Visit the NOAA page on killer whales for more information.

Do otters eat a lot of rockfish? Look in their scat to find out

Sharon Wootton wrote a nice piece in The Everett Herald on SeaDoc's recently-published peer reviewed paper on river otter diet. The concern was that river otters might be hampering rockfish recovery. Turns out while river otters do eat some juvenile rockfish, they primarily eat other intertidal and shallow subtidal fish. Get the full story at The Everett Herald site.

Stewards of the Deep: Underwater monitoring in The Islands' Sounder

Colleen Armstrong of The Islands' Sounder wrote about SeaDoc's collaboration with divers from the Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF.org) on the front page of the paper.

The story included links to REEF's database where you can see detailed findings, including color images of creatures found, for different locations and areas. Visit The Islands' Sounder site to read the article.

 

 

Banner photo courtesy of Janna Nichols / REEF.

SeaDoc/REEF subtidal monitoring project 2014

Photos by Janna Nichols / REEF

The subtidal area is one of the least known parts of the Salish Sea. It's a fantastically colorful and complex place seen only by SCUBA divers and scientists. This is why we partnered with Reef Environmental Education Foundation (www.REEF.org) last year to use trained volunteer divers to keep an eye on what is happening below the water.

So how long does it take to see dramatic changes in subtidal areas?

Turns out a year is enough.

When we first started this subtidal monitoring project in 2013 we anticipated we might have enough data to see changes after 8 or 10 years.

But last October our dives took place just before the now-infamous sea star die-off. At some of the sites where we collected data, divers might have seen on average 20-30 sunflower sea stars. When we re-visited these sites last week, they were mostly gone. Seeing just one was cause for conversation, especially if it was healthy.

Of course, not all the changes were so pronounced, but that doesn't mean the data aren't valuable. Our goal is not only to study changes, but also to document current conditions so that future scientists will have a scientifically-rigorous baseline for understanding potential future shifts in our local environment. Wouldn't it be nice if we had this kind of data from the 1960s?

This year, our team of REEF-trained Advance Assessment Team expert divers returned to 7 sites we surveyed last year, and added 3 new sites. By the end of ten years, we'll have long-term data on up to 20 representative sites around the region. Super cool!

Ever want to get a glimpse of the cool creatures that make the Salish Sea a world-wide mecca for cold water divers? Check out more pictures on the REEF Facebook page.

Tufted puffins receive endangered status in Washington State

Update May 2015

At their April 2015 meeting, the Fish and Wildlife Commission voted unanimously to approve listing the tufted puffin as endangered in Washington State. The listing became official in mid-May.

Thanks to the Fish and Wildlife Commission for taking this important step!

Read the scientific status report that made this listing possible. (PDF)

Update February 2015

In early February, the Fish and Wildlife Commission heard public comments on listing the tufted puffin as endangered.

The Commission will make a decision at their April 9-10 meeting in Olympia. Public comments will be accepted until April 8.

To make your voice heard, send a short comment by email to commission@dfw.wa.gov before April 8.

Read the updated status report (with public comments attached)

Once again we want to say thank you to the generous donors who made it possible for SeaDoc to fund the crucial Status Review that set this process in motion.

It's been a long time coming, but Washington State is in the final stage of deciding whether or not to list the Tufted puffin as a state endangered species.

Tufted puffins used to breed at 43 different nesting colonies in Washington State. Now they are found at only 19, and the state's population is 1/10th of what it was in 1984.

Tufted puffins have been candidates for listing in Washington State since 1998. But you can't move from candidate to listed species without a formal scientific status review. Since the Department of Fish and Wildlife didn't have the resources to write the status review, nothing happened for a long time.

Then SeaDoc stepped in. We knew it was important to get the status review written so that the State could eventually create a recovery plan for puffins. So in 2010 we raised money from private individuals, with gifts ranging from $100 to $23,000. (Crowdfunding before crowdfunding was cool.)

With that money we hired scientist Thor Hanson (familiar to many of you as the author of the award-winning book, Feathers) to draft the status review. Since completion several years ago the report has undergone further editing and refinement by WDFW scientist Gary Wiles, and has been externally reviewed by scientists.

While you're reading the Tufted puffin status review, note that WDFW is also taking comments on another species, Steller sea lions. But this time the proposal is to take them OFF the threatened species list because they've made a strong recovery. Get the full story here.

Want to learn more about threatened and endangered species in the Salish Sea? Every two years SeaDoc tallies all the species in the Salish Sea that are threatened, endangered, or are candidates for listing by Canada, British Columbia, the USA, or Washington State. See the most recent list here through the button below.

SeaDoc helps commercial crabbers recover 550 pots in California

The California Lost Fishing Gear Recovery Project (a self-sustaining project of the SeaDoc Society that operates without any donated funds), got a nice write-up in the Del Norte Triplicate. Kirsten Gilardi, SeaDoc's executive director, and Jen Renzullo, the field manager for the lost gear project, were featured for their innovative work where north coast crab fishermen are actually recovering lost crab pots and turning a profit by selling the pots back to their original owners.

Read the full article or get more of the story on the UC Davis website.

“The most exciting thing about this project is that the fishermen themselves are taking the lead,” said Kirsten Gilardi, director of the California Lost Fishing Gear Recovery Project, a program of the SeaDoc Society, which is part of the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. “They are mobilizing the fishermen to participate, conducting all the transactions of funds and gear, and even realizing financial benefits for their hard work to clean the ocean.”

More coverage can be found at California Sea Grant News.

 

 

Banner photo: Jennifer Renzullo of SeaDoc’s California Lost Fishing Gear Recovery Project heads out to sea with fishermen from Eureka to collect lost crabbing gear. Photo courtesy of J. Cox.

Comment period for Steller sea lion de-listing

Washington State is planning to remove Steller sea lions from Washington's state list of threatened species, where they have been since 1993. The Eastern DPS (distinct population segment) of Stellers includes the population living along the west coast of North America from Southeast Alaska to central California. The population has recovered from an estimated 18,313 animals in 1979 to over 70,000 animals in 2010. Individuals, primarily males, can usually be found in the Salish Sea between September and May.

The Eastern DPS was de-listed from the US federal list of endangered species in December 2013.

The comment period for this action by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ends on December 11, 2014.

You may submit comments by email to TandEpubliccom@dfw.wa.gov or by mail to:

Listing and Recovery Section Manager, Wildlife Program
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way
North Olympia, WA 98501-1091

Read the complete status review at the WDFW website.

Here is the Executive Summary from the document:

Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Washington belong to the eastern distinct population segment (DPS), which is one of two DPSs comprising the species. The eastern DPS ranges along the west coast of North America from Southeast Alaska to central California (i.e., east of 144°W longitude). Most Steller sea lions migrate to rookeries on islands and offshore rocks for breeding and pupping from May to August. At the rookeries, adult males defend breeding territories and compete for females; pups are born from late May to early July. Steller sea lions are dietary generalists that feed on a variety of prey. Prey commonly eaten in Washington include Pacific hake, rockfish, skates, flounders, herring, salmon, smelt, shad, and cod; white sturgeon are among the species eaten in the Columbia River. Seasonal concentrations of prey are commonly targeted. Most foraging occurs within 60 km of land and foraging trips are interspersed with regular visits to onshore resting sites known as haulouts. Haulouts in Washington are preferentially located on islands with rocky shorelines and wave-cut platforms, but cobble beaches and human-made structures such as jetties, navigational buoys, docks, and log booms are also used.

The eastern DPS, including the Steller sea lions found in Washington, experienced a major decline in abundance through much of the 1900s due primarily to human control efforts. Protections implemented during and after the 1970s against deliberate killing and other threats reversed this trend and have resulted in a period of sustained population growth. From 1979 to 2010, numbers of non-pups (individuals ≥1 year of age) and pups in the eastern DPS increased at average annual rates of 2.99% and 4.18%, respectively, with the overall population growing from an estimated 18,313 animals to 70,174 animals. Steller sea lion abundance in Washington has also grown, with numbers of non-pups at four sites used for trend analysis increasing at an average annual rate of 9.13% from 1989 to 2013. Abundance in the state peaks during the non-breeding season at roughly 2,000-2,500 animals. Most animals occur along the outer coast, with smaller numbers visiting the inner marine waters. Washington does not support any recognized rookeries (defined as having >50 pups born per year). Pupping did not occur in the state during most of the 20th century, however, small but increasing numbers of pups have been born at several sites since 1992, with a total of 60 tallied in 2014. Therefore, nearly all animals visiting Washington are born at rookeries in other states and British Columbia. Twenty-two haulouts are currently known in Washington. Additionally, major haulouts at the mouth of the Columbia River (Oregon) and along southern Vancouver Island and in the Strait of Georgia (British Columbia) are located close to the state’s waters.

The eastern DPS and Steller sea lion numbers in Washington are expected to continue increasing in the near future until eventually reaching carrying capacity with available prey resources. Sustained population growth and lack of significant threats resulted in federal delisting of the eastern DPS in December 2013. The eastern DPS may be adversely impacted by a number of known or potential human-related factors, including climate change, reduced prey abundance through competition with fisheries, human disturbance, incidental take in fishing gear, entanglement in marine debris, intentional killing, environmental contaminants, oil spills, diseases and parasites, and harmful algal blooms. An important future concern is that altered ocean conditions resulting from climate change may reduce prey availability for the species. Despite the existence of these potential adverse factors, the population has successfully recovered during the past few decades.

For these reasons, the Department recommends that Steller sea lions be delisted at the state level in Washington. If delisting occurs, the species will continue to receive protection through the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act and through its classification as a “protected wildlife” species under state law. However, delisting could lead to the future lethal removal of small numbers of individuals at locations where authorized by federal and state law.

 

 

Banner photo: Steller sea lions from the Eastern DPS (photographed in Alaska). Courtesy of richardrichard via Compfightcc.

How do you help a 2,000 pound wild animal that’s entangled?

Entangled sea lion. SeaDoc photo.

Entangled sea lion. SeaDoc photo.

When a sea lion gets a plastic packing strap stuck around its neck, it’s not a pretty sight. The animal doesn’t die right away. As the seal grows, the strap gets tighter and tighter. Eventually the animal can starve or strangle.

For almost 2 years, SeaDoc and collaborators from the San Juan County Marine Mammal Stranding Network, the Whale Museum, the Vancouver Aquarium, and the Seattle Aquarium have been working with NOAA Fisheries to create a plan for responding to entangled sea lions. Darting a 2,000-pound animal that isn’t feeling well and is precariously perched on rocks near the water is not an easy undertaking. In fact, without the right plan and expertise, it’s fraught with risks for both the animal and the people trying to help it.

Fortunately our collaborators worked hard to come up with a safe protocol, one that has been field tested over a dozen times in Canada under the leadership of the Vancouver Aquarium.

So when an entangled sea lion was spotted last month near the south end of Lopez Island, NOAA gave permission for an intervention. We mobilized an international team with veterinarians from both the Seattle and Vancouver aquariums, and technical staff from the Stranding Network and Whale Museum, with additional law enforcement help from NOAA and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

During the morning slack tide, we found the entangled animal hauled out on the rocks, but weren’t able to dart it successfully. In the afternoon we returned to search again, and were surprised to see a different entangled animal. We were able to dart, recover, and release this animal after determining that the entangling material had broken off, leaving a nasty wound behind.

Most of SeaDoc’s veterinary work is at the level of species or populations, but in this case we’re trying to help individual animals that have been injured by human garbage. It is an animal welfare issue but it also is providing skills that could benefit an endangered species entangled in our trash.

Videos of prior disentanglement responses carried out by the Vancouver Aquarium:

Do river otters eat endangered rockfish?

In a sea filled with charismatic mammals like killer whales and Steller sea lions, it’s easy to overlook a smaller critter whose name might make you think it’s not even found near saltwater. However, as shoreline residents know, the Salish Sea is home to thousands of river otters. And with their fearless ways and fearsome canines—as well as their webbed toes and ability to dive at least 60 feet deep - these whiskered members of the weasel family are prodigious predators of marine species. A previous study in British Columbia found that otters fueled their high metabolisms in part by consuming a lot of rockfish, with up to a third of all scat samples containing rockfish remains. Since rockfish populations are so depleted that all fishing for them has now been banned on the US side of the Salish Sea, we needed to answer an important question: As we invest in rockfish recovery, are river otters eating up our profits?

To find out, SeaDoc-funded researchers visited otter latrines around the San Juan Islands. Otter scat was examined for fish bones and otoliths (ear bones) to determine species and age of prey. Otters are indeed seafood fanatics: fish were present in 100% of the samples.

Fortunately for our endangered rockfish, though, the otters seem to specialize in the small lower intertidal and shallow subtidal fish such as the gunnels, sculpins, and pricklebacks. Rockfish occurred most frequently in samples from San Juan Island (22%), and most rarely (2.7%) Fidalgo, Island. Also encouraging was that otoliths showed that less than half the rockfish taken by otters were adults - the breeders that are critical to replenishing rockfish stocks.

Tracking scat and identifying otter diet is the kind basic science that, with your generous support, is helping us piece together the incredibly complex ecology of the Salish Sea and understand how we can best restore it.

Can't access it through that link? Request a copy by emailing the office at seadoc@seadocsociety.org

 

 

Banner photo courtesy of Phil Green/The Nature Conservancy.

Marine birds in decline: Loss of small fish may be to blame

The-Seattle-Times-News-sports-weather-events-in-the-Northwest.jpg

From white-winged scoters and surf scoters to long-tailed ducks, murres, loons and some seagulls, the number of everyday marine birds here has plummeted dramatically in recent decades. The reasons are often complex, but for many the loss of forage fish like herring might hold a clue. This article was on the front page of the Seattle Times on July 25, 2014.

Read the full article.

New protocol will enhance killer whale knowledge

Killer whale strandings are rare and tragic events, which is why it’s so important that scientists respond quickly and appropriately to collect as much data as possible.

According to Dr. Joe Gaydos, Wildlife Veterinarian and Chief Scientists of UC Davis’s SeaDoc Society, “Every killer whale stranding represents an opportunity for researchers to learn more about the species. It’s important that we have a system to capture as much information as possible in each event.”

A team of researchers from the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, the University of British Columbia (UBC) and SeaWorld came together this year to do just that. The team has created the new Killer Whale Necropsy and Disease Testing Protocol, which is an updated version of a document that was originally written back in 2004.

That original protocol greatly enhanced killer whale examinations in the Northeast Pacific Ocean, but plenty of advances have been made in the ensuing decade. The new protocol captures that new knowledge in an effort heighten awareness of health concerns and increase the number of complete postmortem standardized necropsies.

Since the original protocol, scientists have performed necropsies on one out of every three killer whales that strand in the North Pacific – a remarkable 1,600 percent increase in effort. The data collected – on causes of death, contaminants, and genetics – are already being used to help recover endangered killer whale populations.

Dr. Steve Raverty, a UBC faculty member at the UBC Marine Mammal Research Unit, points out that “Revision of the necropsy protocols is the first of a multiphase approach to further understand health and disease in these majestic animals, icons of the Pacific Northwest.”

The new protocol will be critical in helping understand how disease might impact the recovery of small declining killer whale populations, such as the southern resident killer whales.

In the new protocol, sample collection is standardized and guidelines are provided to help identify research personnel that can assist in a given stranding incident. It also helps assess the impact of sound on killer whale ear anatomy. Dr. Raverty said, “Thanks to research over the last decade, we now have a better understanding of how sound can damage whale ear structure and this data has informed the protocol. When we examine a dead whale, we now have better tools to determine if it got stranded because of a blast or other sonar incident.”

According to Judy St. Leger "The loss of any of these animals is always a sad event. However, data from systematic evaluations provides a window into the world of killer whales. We can compare results and identify ways to positively impact populations."

While the testing is focused on North American resources, the sampling protocol is universal and this protocol can be implemented globally. It can be accessed for free using the button below.

Increase in harbor porpoise strandings

The number of harbor porpoise strandings in May of 2014 was higher than usual (but not higher than the number in 2012). Joe Gaydos was quoted in the Journal of the San Juans:

In fact, according to Dr. Joe Gaydos of the Orcas Island-based SeaDoc Society, spring is the time of year when harbor porpoise typically migrate en masse from the mouth of Juan de Fuca Strait into the heart of the Salish Sea and strandings are not uncommon at that time. Still, Gaydos, who will perform the early June necropsies, said the spate of strandings warrant examination to find out if an infectious disease or virus, such as pneumonia, may be responsible or contributed to the deaths.

Tracking Transboundary Trouble

Basking shark copyright Florian Graner. Used with permission.

Basking shark copyright Florian Graner. Used with permission.

How do you know if your ecosystem is in trouble? One clue is the number of species that are in decline or endangered. If that number gets bigger over time, you’re probably heading in the wrong direction.

Publications

We publish our Species of Concern analysis approximately every two years in conjunction with the biennial Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference.

In any particular year species might be added or removed from the list. For example, in 2008, 3 species were added, 2 were removed, and the listing status for 12 previously included species was changed by one or more jurisdiction.

Each jurisdiction in the Salish Sea (Canada, the United States, British Columbia, and Washington State) keeps their own list of species in trouble, but until 2002 nobody kept track of the total number of threated and endangered species in the whole ecosystem. Back then, SeaDoc scientists found a total of 60 species of Salish Sea invertebrates, fish, reptiles, birds, and mammals that we needed to worry about.

Thanks to your support we’ve been able to repeat the analysis every two years. Unfortunately, the list keeps growing. Our latest accounting showed that the total number of species at risk has now nearly doubled, to 119. Recently listed species include the Basking shark, North Pacific spiny dogfish, Pacific Ocean perch, and Baird’s beaked whale. The fact that the list has almost doubled is a bad sign, and it suggests that our entire ecosystem is at risk.

Your support enables us to take on these long-term, ecosystem-level initiatives that allow us to diagnose, and eventually reverse, problems like transboundary species declines. Thanks to your investments we’re able to publish scientifically rigorous metrics that help citizens and policy makers understand the big picture.

Type Percentage Listed Ratio
Macro invertebrates 1% 2/3000 (estimated, from unpublished data)
Reptiles 100% 2/2
Fish 17% 42/253 (Pietsch and Orr, in press)
Birds 32% 55/172 (Gaydos and Pearson, 2011)
Mammals 35% 13/37 (Gaydos and Pearson, 2011)

The high proportion of species of concern is suggestive of ecosystem decay (Bierregard et al., 2001) and we suggest that it is time to consider the entire Salish Sea an ecosystem of concern. Increased funding and improved efforts to recover declining populations of species and recover this ecosystem are urgently needed to stop the insidious loss of species and ecosystem decay.

Spiny dogfish by NOAA’s National Ocean Service CC

Spiny dogfish by NOAA’s National Ocean Service CC

Award-winning presentation

At the 2014 conference, the 2013 paper was presented by co-author Jacq Zier, who won first prize in the undergraduate division for an oral presentation.

Orcas High School senior class chooses SeaDoc for $2,500 donation

lancaster-ehrmantrout.jpeg

The senior class at Orcas High School awarded $2,500 to SeaDoc as part of the 2014 grants program of the Orcas Island Community Foundation. Each year a generous donor gives $5,000 to the graduating class at the high school for them to pass on to one or more non-profits; sort of a primer on philanthropy. The students discuss and debate which non-profits they would like to support.

We were thrilled when seniors Lindsay Lancaster and Brigid Ehrmantrout named SeaDoc to receive a $2,500 donation to recognize not only our work protecting the marine environment but also our efforts to educate people about the cutting-edge science that's being done to protect wildlife. As Joe Gaydos said to the local newspaper reporter who was there, "What an honor to have this donation, and even more importantly, this vote of confidence from tomorrow's leaders!"

Our thanks and congratulations go out to the graduating seniors!

See more in The Islands' Sounder.

Orcas Issues also covered the event:

The Celebration was capped off by the surprise announcement of the Youth Philanthropy Awards. The OISD Senior High School class was given the opportunity to distribute $5000. They researched their options, exploring their priorities and values, and debated the merits of many sectors and programs. This year, the class selected the Friends of Moran and SeaDoc, organizations that help preserve the natural environment of the island and surrounding waters. Each organization received a $2500 grant.

Intern Jacq Zier wins presentation prize at Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference

zier-contributed.jpg

As highlighted in The Islands Sounder, SeaDoc intern Jacq Zier won first place in the undergraduate category at the Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference for her presentation on the 2013 Species of Concern in the Salish Sea paper she co-authored with Joe Gaydos.

Read the article.

You can access the 2013 Species of Concern paper for free below.

San Juan Islands bathymetry in Google Earth

Screenshot of Google Earth with SeaDoc’s bathymetry overlay.

Screenshot of Google Earth with SeaDoc’s bathymetry overlay.

Have you checked out what the San Juan Islands look like in Google Earth? Maybe you've noticed that you don't get much detail on what's underneath the surface. Never fear. SeaDoc and the Tombolo Mapping Lab (now affiliated with SeaDoc) have an "overlay layer" you can download for Google Earth. The file will superimpose our bathymetry data on top of the Google Earth data, giving you a bird's eye view of the underwater geography.

These basemap images work in the desktop version of Google Earth. That's the one you download to your computer, not the one you use online in Google Maps.

Killer whales

Photo by J. Gaydos

Photo by J. Gaydos

Killer whales (Orcinus orca) are a charismatic species and a Pacific Northwest icon. The SeaDoc Society has been involved in killer whale research since the organization started. We have helped to identify sources of toxins in killer whales, led the creation of a plan to keep killer whales out of oil spills, and have vastly improved our knowledge about diseases that can impact killer whale recovery.

All of these efforts are emblematic of SeaDoc's approach to science and to ecosystem restoration and wildlife protection.

Keeping killer whales out of oil spills

When NOAA Fisheries identified that an oil spill was a huge risk for the Endangered southern resident killer whale population, they knew they had to create a contingency plan for keeping whales out of an oil spill if it were to happen and they looked to SeaDoc to help make this plan.

In the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster in Alaska, two pods of killer whales were decimated. One has just recently started to recover; the other is probably headed for extinction. Before that disaster, people thought killer whales would be able to stay out of spilled oil. The Exxon Valdez proved that wasn't the case.

In 2007, SeaDoc partnered with NOAA to bring together a group of killer whale experts and spill response professionals from the US and Canada to discuss how killer whales could be kept out of a major spill.

Over the course of the two-day workshop, the participants discussed the effects of oil on cetaceans, killer whale mortality from the Exxon Valdez event, permit issues, risk assessments, response coordination, availability of equipment, pre- and post-event monitoring, and techniques for hazing animals to keep them away from oiled areas.

The result is that we are much more prepared to save whales’ lives in the event of a catastrophic spill. The response plan for keeping killer whales out of a spill is now part of the  Northwest Area Contingency Plan, which is the region's go-to manual for dealing with an oil spill. Responders now have techniques and equipment ready to put into action.

SeaDoc’s work on killer whales and oil spills is a good example of how we bring people together to solve tough issues, especially issues that involve both sides of the international border that splits the Salish Sea.

Unraveling the mystery of killer whale diseases

Stranded killer whale: Jeff Jacobsen, Humboldt State University Vertebrate Museum
Stranded killer whale: Jeff Jacobsen, Humboldt State University Vertebrate Museum

Disease can be as important as predation when shaping populations and ecosystems. However, when the southern resident killer whale population was listed by the Canadian and US Federal governments, very little was known about how diseases could impact killer whale recovery. SeaDoc published the first comprehensive paper on diseases of killer whales, identifying which ones were of greatest concern when recovering populations in decline.

This study was a good first step, but showed us that we really knew very little about killer whale diseases. In an attempt to learn more, SeaDoc partnered with NOAA and Dr. Steven Raverty at UBC to create the first ever protocol designed to help responders gather as much information as possible from stranded killer whales.

This protocol, which was revised and reissued in 2014, has been widely used and has helped stranding responders maximize the amount of information learned from every carcass. Thanks to this protocol and to dedicated funding from NOAA to analyze samples, since 2004 scientists have performed necropsies on 1 out of every 3 killer whales that strand in the North Pacific – a remarkable 1600% increase in effort. The data collected – on causes of death, contaminants, and genetics - are already being used to help recover endangered killer whale populations.

In 2014, SeaDoc lead a study to identify killer whale stranding trends from as far back as 1925.

Understanding toxins in killer whales

The high levels of persistent organic pollutants in killer whales has been identified as an important cause for their decline and reason for their slow recovery. We knew that these contaminants came from the salmon that resident killer whales ate, but didn't know whether those contaminants got into salmon locally or when they grew out in the Pacific Ocean before returning to spawn. SeaDoc funded Drs. Peter Ross, Donna Cullon and others to study this. They found that that 97 to 99% of  polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) in adult chinook salmon (resident's favorite prey item) were acquired during their time at sea and not from the Salish Sea. This study also found that southerly chinook salmon stocks had a lower fat content, meaning that this could cause southern resident killer whales to increase their salmon consumption by as much as 50%, which would further increase their exposure to these contaminants.

SeaDoc's work on killer whales is a good example of how we identify areas where good scientific information is missing, and then structure projects that can fill those gaps. In the case of the necropsy protocol, a relatively small amount of effort has resulted in a much more substantial increase in our knowledge about what is happening to this important species.

Support SeaDoc's innovative projects

Private donations from people like you provide most of the support we use to help create a healthier Salish Sea.

Please consider making a donation to support the Salish Sea wildlife you care about.

Make a donation

Sign up for our newsletter

How SeaDoc has helped Scoters

Surf Scoter. Photo by Dr. Eric Anderson

Surf Scoter. Photo by Dr. Eric Anderson

There are 3 species of Scoters in the Salish Sea; Surf, White-winged, and Black. Scoters are among many species of sea birds and sea ducks that have seen major population declines in recent years. Birds are sentinels for the health of our ecosystem and their declines are telling us that something is seriously wrong. Since 2000, the SeaDoc Society has been conducting innovative studies to advance our knowledge of the reasons for seabird declines and to craft ways to protect them.

For Scoters, our work has included surgically implanting satellite transmitters so biologists can study migration routes, bringing scientists together to identify knowledge gaps and where science shows us that we need a policy change, and using science to understand how hunting is impacting populations and how changing food availability can support or hinder recovery.

Surgical implantation of satellite transmitters

Satellite transmitters can be used to better understand the movement patterns of many wildlife species. For Scoters, satellite transmitters are implanted in the ceolomic cavity with the antennae exiting from the lower back. SeaDoc helped the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife surgically implanting satellite transmitters in nearly 100 Scoters to track their winter movements (they tend to stay pretty local when they winter on the Salish Sea) and their summer migrations (after their third year they migrate north into Canada and Alaska to breed).

Hunting rules that needed adjustment

What do you do when a species in decline is still being hunted or fished? Well, you better get some data to see if harvest is high enough to be adding to the problem.

When it came to the decline of Scoters, we knew hunting was not the root of the decline, but hunters and managers were not sure whether hunting was having an added impact. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife had collected data on Scoter hunting, but they didn't have the funds to analyze the data.

So SeaDoc stepped in, seeing the opportunity to use good science to help answer a tough management question.

Scoter in rehab tank. Photo by Linda Tanner via Flickr Creative Commons

Scoter in rehab tank. Photo by Linda Tanner via Flickr Creative Commons

The analysis showed that there were 3 counties in Washington where hunting was occuring at an unsustainable level. Remember, Scoters stick around in a small area during the winter so focused hunting could really impact species in a small area.

We shared this information with the Fish and Wildlife Commission, which is the body responsible for making hunting rules. They eventually reduced the bag limits on Scoter hunting throughout the state and made a ruling that if the Scoter population dropped below 50,000 animals, all hunting would stop. This is an example of how SeaDoc works to gather good data and makes the science gets off the shelf and into the hands of decision-makers.

We are not an advocacy group and we are not anti-hunting. We just wanted to get the data needed to see if hunting was having an impact, because that type of information is critical to enable managers to make informed decisions.

Scoter and whales

Food webs can be complex. Would you have thought that the feeding behavior of gray whales has an impact on the diets of diving sea ducks? A 2008 paper supported by SeaDoc funding describes how gray whales disturb the bottom when they feed, which creates better feeding opportunities for Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata). Dr. Eric Anderson found that the feeding opportunities presented by gray whales can provide particularly important foraging opportunities for Scoters during spring, when other foods may have declined and requirements to prepare for migration and reproduction are high.

How Scoter migration patterns reflect food availability

Photo credit: blindgrasshopper via Flickr Creative Commons
Photo credit: blindgrasshopper via Flickr Creative Commons

Thousands of Scoters can be found eating mussels in Penn Cove, Washington during the fall and early winter. But then they leave. Why?

It turns out—as revealed by a SeaDoc-supported study—that Scoters prefer mussels of a certain size. Once that size class of mussel is hard to find, Scoters will move on to find other food. This makes sense, when you know that Scoters swallow the mussels whole.

When the right size mussels aren't available, it’s more productive for Scoters to move to eelgrass habitats where they can feed on creatures like small crabs and shrimp that live on the eelgrass. The authors of this  study hypothesize that declines in eelgrass beds may be part of the reason that Scoter populations have declined so significantly.

This study is another reminder that food webs are complex (something we’ve been saying for years) and that the ecosystem and its varied habitats are highly interconnected.

Science helps us understand these relationships and helps us identify and protect important habitats and species.

Support SeaDoc's innovative projects

Private donations from people like you provide most of the support we use to help create a healthier Salish Sea.

Please consider making a donation to support the Salish Sea wildlife you care about.

Make a donation

Sign up for our newsletter